Cross-Lingual Reusability of LLM Pipelines: Financial Extraction, Multilingual Reasoning, and Semantic Screening
arXiv:2610.27043v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Financial institutions increasingly deploy large language models (LLMs) in multilingual markets, raising a practical question: can pipelines developed and validated in English be reused across languages, or must they be rebuilt per locale? We test cross-lingual reusability along three dimensions--accuracy, reasoning-effort transfer, and behavioural stability--through three complementary tasks. Task 1 (cheque extraction) and Task 2 (Mintaka QA with
Read original sourceSource record
Research analysis
Observed information
Public summary: arXiv:2610.27043v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Financial institutions increasingly deploy large language models (LLMs) in multilingual markets, raising a practical question: can pipelines developed and validated in English be reused across languages, or must they be rebuilt per locale? We test cross-lingual reusability along three dimensions--accuracy, reasoning-effort transfer, and behavioural stability--through three complementary tasks. Task 1 (cheque extraction) and Task 2 (Mintaka QA with
Related signals
456 same-theme leads appeared across 17 sources in 30 days; recurrence does not prove revenue.
Opportunity hypothesis
This AI infrastructure product change may create upgrade, compatibility, training, review or alternative needs.
Missing evidence
Affected users, switching cost, adoption scale and a chargeable deliverable are missing.
Validation steps
Confirm versions and users, extract repeated barriers, then test an offer deliverable within two weeks.