WeWorkBuddy

首页 / 浏览

全部内容

浏览全部已收录的公开内容,包括尚未归入主分类的条目。

7899 条公开内容

arXiv ·

DelegateEval: Evaluating Platforms for Personal External Service Agents

arXiv:2611.07508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents that work for an individual over time may also help that individual serve external clients. We define a personal external service agent as an agent authorized and continuously managed by a specific individual to accept client requests, deliver work, and provide ongoing support using that person's knowledge, experience, professional methods, and service boundaries. Such agents could allow individuals to serve more clients with less direct

arXiv ·

SAVeR$^2$: Reasoning-based Safety Alignment for Large Reasoning Models via Verifiable Rewards

arXiv:2611.07482v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved impressive performance via explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, yet this process introduces critical safety risks. We formalize LRM safety objectives as requiring non-malicious reasoning and answers, safety consistency, and explicit intent identification. We argue that existing alignment methods suffer from poor adversarial generalization, a significant ``safety tax'' on reasoning, and unfaithful co

arXiv ·

FINCOSMOS: An Open-World Evaluation Paradigm for Agents in Finance

arXiv:2611.07464v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language agents increasingly work for users on the open Web, and finance is where trusting them is hardest. The data must come from the Web, the strategy lives in the user's head, and correctness depends on time, so an agent can fail silently: a strategy the user never asked for, unverified data, or a backtest that uses the future yields a report as convincing as a correct one. Existing benchmarks close the world somewhere, fixing the task, the dat

arXiv ·

EnvOpt: Automated Optimization for Agent Environments

arXiv:2611.07372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An LLM agent's cost and success depend on its model, its harness, and its environment. In addition to the widely studied directions of parameter tuning and harness optimization, we propose the third direction: optimization over stationary environments. Agents are often deployed in rich environments shared by many tasks, such as a company's Slack workspace or a complex collection of data sources, documents or tickets. We call these environments stat

arXiv ·

Robust Ranking of Port Impacts from Impending Tropical Cyclones: A Two-Stage Recommendation System

arXiv:2611.07296v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a tropical cyclone (TC) threatens several ports, preparedness planning depends on anticipating which ports are likely to be affected and where disruptions may last longest. Limited historical observations at individual ports and uncertainty in landfall location make these relative impacts difficult to estimate. We use a two-stage recommendation framework that first selects candidate ports based on their proximity to the expected landfall locat

arXiv ·

Goal Revelation as a Bridge Between Information-Theoretic Empowerment and Capability-Based Human Power

arXiv:2611.07247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Power matters for AI safety. Optimal agents tend to acquire power across a wide range of objectives (instrumental convergence). As we embed AI agents into socio-technical systems, humans risk gradual disempowerment. Both concerns call for a formal, quantitative measure of power. Two such measures in the context of Markov games are information-theoretic empowerment, the capacity of the channel from an agent's actions to future states, and capability

arXiv ·

PromptOps: Iterative Prompt Optimization for LLM-as-a-Judge Systems

arXiv:2611.07123v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges for evaluating the behavior of chatbots and other AI systems. In deployment, however, their agreement with the intended human evaluation policy may degrade as user interactions and score distributions change. Existing automatic prompt optimization methods are primarily studied as one-shot procedures on static development sets and therefore provide limited guidance for maintainin

arXiv ·

Synthesizing symbolic models of human and machine reasoning at scale

arXiv:2611.07088v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Symbolic models offer a powerful account of cognition, but their scope has historically been limited by the need for hand-engineering and computational tractability. We show how advances in artificial intelligence (AI) can scale symbolic modeling and help overcome these engineering limitations. We introduce Behavior-Conditioned Symbolic Synthesis (BCSS)---an approach for automated search of interpretable, deterministic symbolic programs that verifi

arXiv ·

When Verification Is Not Agreement: Cross-Agent LLM-to-Dafny Formalization

arXiv:2611.07073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A verified Dafny postcondition certifies that a formula holds, but it does not guarantee that the result was reached through genuine independent reasoning. We introduce a cross-agent formalization protocol where a Specifier model translates clinical trial criteria into a Dafny predicate, and an Implementer model writes an operational method checked against it. A same-model control establishes that even with no capability gap, independent re-extract

arXiv ·

Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Epigraph-Form Guided Exploration

arXiv:2611.07066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Discovering cooperative behavior in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is challenging due to the combinatorial complexity of joint state-action spaces, which hinders the emergence of coordinated behaviors from trial-and-error alone. Intrinsic rewards are often used to aid discovery, but naively combining them with team objectives can distort the learning signal, compromising task performance. In this paper, we propose EFXPLORER, a constraine

arXiv ·

Closed-Loop Agent Evaluation: Layered Measurement and Self-Calibration

arXiv:2611.07051v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Once an agent is live, teams want to know whether it is doing its job, not just whether it throws errors. Yet most evaluation is one-off: a benchmark run, a look at traces, a single score. Its conclusions neither check themselves nor reach the agent. We propose closed-loop evaluation, an evaluation method for deployed agents. It models evaluation as performance estimation under biased raters and censored outcomes, and it requires every level's conc

arXiv ·

Adapting the Process of Adaptation: Darwinian, Lamarckian, and Agent-Directed Evolution in AI

arXiv:2611.07048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evolution has shaped intelligence for billions of years. Artificial intelligence (AI) now raises a striking possibility: intelligence may begin to direct its own evolution. As AI agents become capable of modifying and evaluating their own behavior, how quickly could they improve, and how can that improvement remain safe? We develop a theoretical framework comparing Darwinian, Lamarckian, and agent-directed evolution following environmental change.

arXiv ·

Trust Responsive Runtime Authorization for Agentic AI with Empirical Characterization of Policy Behavior and Parameter Sensitivity

arXiv:2611.06996v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The policy that converts runtime estimates of an autonomous agent's condition into operational authority is rarely specified or measured. We empirically characterize the Trust Responsive Authorization Policy (TRAP), which maps an Authorization Readiness Score (ARS), a weighted combination of runtime trust, operational stability, and contextual risk, onto discrete authorization levels through an asymmetric rule: escalation requires consecutive obser

arXiv ·

Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization

arXiv:2611.06995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have ushered in a new age of proof abundance, but helping humans understand these proofs requires new attention to the differences in how AI agents and humans pursue a proof-making task. We present "simulated collaboration", a methodology that allows us to examine two key questions: (1) the relative attention AI agents pay to surface syntax or, conversely, deeper underlying semantics, and (2) how and where AI ag

arXiv ·

The Two-Ledger Model: Transaction-Grain Cost Accounting for Multi-Agent AI Systems Across Clouds, Models, and Systems of Record

arXiv:2611.06989v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprises run business transactions through multi-agent AI systems spanning clouds, large language models (LLMs), orchestration harnesses, and systems of record. Finance receives AI cost only at settlement grain, aggregated by SKU and charge period. The business question (what did this order, claim, or case cost in AI?) cannot be answered from billing data, because providers never see enterprise transaction boundaries. The FinOps Open Cost and Us

arXiv ·

Resource-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Post-Training through Elastic Expert Parallelism

arXiv:2611.06984v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning post-training improves the capabilities of large language models, but generating training responses is a major computational bottleneck. In mixture-of-experts models, workers that finish their assigned responses may remain occupied because their experts are still needed by workers processing longer responses. Consequently, approximately one-third of occupied worker time in the baseline occurs after local response generation f

arXiv ·

BlockLock: Reproducible LLM Inference with Fixed Batch Geometry

arXiv:2611.06977v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reproducible LLM inference requires that a request produces the same output regardless of the other requests in the batch. Existing solutions pay for this in different ways: batch-invariant kernels constrain every operator, and isolating prefill with fixed-shape decode ({our CoRun-style baseline}) gives up shared prefill compute and pads decode. We present BlockLock, which keeps shared batched prefill and pins only the numerical path of the protect

arXiv ·

KDASO: Knowledge-Data Dual-Driven Automated Skill Optimization for Liability Adjudication Tasks

arXiv:2611.06972v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Liability adjudication tasks (e.g., legal charge determination) require analyzing event descriptions against domain-specific skills to determine whether a party should bear liability. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in this area by leveraging executable skills for interpretable reasoning, existing approaches face three critical limitations: skill libraries become stale as real-world scenarios dynamically evolve, skill descript

arXiv ·

Formalizing inverse problems in the age of AI: possibilities, pitfalls, and an invitation

arXiv:2611.06962v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Proof assistants such as Lean check mathematical proofs down to the axioms, and AI agents have recently made writing such proofs cheap. We describe AutoIP, a Lean library in which classical linear regularization theory, together with the functional analysis it rests on, has been autoformalized by AI agents. A machine-checked proof certifies only the formal statement it proves, so the remaining human task is to confirm that each formal statement say

arXiv ·

Discourse Analysis of Legislative Bill Discussions

arXiv:2611.05381v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legislative hearings are distinct communication events with their own human recognizable structure and logic, yet they have been analyzed as distinct phenomena beyond their transcripts. Understanding legislative hearings at a deeper level is a major step in analyzing the work and power relationships within democratic bodies. In this work, we present a novel end-to-end pipeline for parsing rhetorical structures from legislative committee hearings wi

arXiv ·

DS@GT ARC at CheckThat! 2026: A Verdict-Anchored Pipeline for Generating Fact-Checking Articles

arXiv:2611.05382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Misinformation spreads faster than professional fact-checkers can manually verify it and write articles explaining their verdicts. This creates a need to automate the production of fact-checking articles. This paper details work done by the DS@GT ARC team for CLEF 2026 CheckThat! Lab Task 3 Fact-Checking Article Generation. We seek to generate a full fact-checking article from a claim, its original verdict, and a set of scraped source documents. Ou

arXiv ·

CCDWIKI: Decoupling Case Formulation from Response Generation in Longitudinal CBT Dialogue

arXiv:2611.05383v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) demands more than empathic validation, requiring instead a structured formulation of the interplay among situations, automatic thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. Therapists formalize this interplay through a Cognitive Conceptualization Diagram, where maintaining longitudinal coherence necessitates continuous evidential adjudication to separate tentative hypotheses from established findings. Current dialogue system

arXiv ·

Human-like cross-language generalisation in deep neural speaker embeddings and its acoustic foundations

arXiv:2611.05384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generalisability is a central question for deep neural networks, including the cross-language generalisation of speaker embeddings. This study examined whether deep neural speaker embeddings generalise across languages and how such generalisation relates to human perception and acoustic structure. Using Cantonese--English bilingual speech presented in within- and cross-language conditions, we derived similarity from 18 state-of-the-art models and c

arXiv ·

Same Origin, Different Verdicts: Text Production Conditions Confound Machine-Generated Text Detection in Russian

arXiv:2611.05385v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated detection of machine-generated text is applied where the verdict carries a cost for the author, yet origin is a property of the production process, not an observable property of the text. The conditions under which a text is produced push it in the same direction in which a generative model is presumed to push it. This study measures the contribution of these conditions while origin is held fixed. The Russian-language corpus of 1882 docum

arXiv ·

SRRM: A Retrieval-Reconstruction Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Context Memory in Small Language Models

arXiv:2611.05386v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Small Language Models (SLMs) are increasingly deployed on consumer-grade hardware, yet their ability to preserve information across progressively longer contexts remains insufficiently understood. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate retrieval-oriented tasks, providing limited insight into whether successful retrieval reflects comprehensive long-context memory preservation. To address this limitation, this paper introduces Simple Retrieval-Recons

arXiv ·

AI-Driven SaaS Platform Integration: AI Express for Unified Generative AI Services with Pay-As-You-Go Credit Systems and Scalable Microservice Architecture

arXiv:2611.05389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI is currently fragmented, with separate subscriptions required for text generation, image synthesis, and code assistance, leading to high costs and workflow disruptions. AI Express is a SaaS platform that consolidates these capabilities into a unified pay-as-you-go service. The platform provides a range of AI tools, including a Core Code Reviewer that evaluates GitHub repositories, a Text-to-Website generator that converts text into fu

arXiv ·

When to Ask, When to Answer: Strategic Clarification for Ambiguous Reference Resolution in Dialogue

arXiv:2611.05517v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For humans, referential disambiguation is a collaborative process involving clarification questions asked when they will meaningfully change the outcome. However, large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be biased toward premature answering, preferring definite single-turn responses over more clarification exchanges. In this paper, we study the problem of "strategic clarification" -- asking clarification questions in a reference game when th

arXiv ·

Rewrite, Then Veto: Rewriter-Agnostic Edit Gating for LLM-Based Post-OCR Correction

arXiv:2611.05539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs can repair noisy OCR transcripts of historical documents, but they also change text that was already correct. We propose EditVeto, a veto gate placed after a full-context LLM rewrite. The rewrite is character-aligned to the OCR input, its differences are split into blocks, and a 0.6B-parameter gate keeps or reverts each block. An oracle analysis motivates the design: given the true error locations, per-span generation is worse than no correcti

arXiv ·

RAGCompass: Generalizable Retriever Routing via Reranking

arXiv:2611.05596v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Different retrievers exist for retrieval-augmented generation, yet none performs best for all queries. Therefore, the key question is: given a query and retrieved passages from different retrievers, which one is most suited for that query? Existing routers usually make predictions from query-specific features and a fixed pool of retrievers; such routers have no output for an unseen retriever and are incapable by design on a new corpus. To fill thes

arXiv ·

Contextual Pictograms for Repairing Multilingual ASR Errors

arXiv:2611.05637v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speech transcription errors can be difficult to recognize when competing word hypotheses are unfamiliar or visually similar. We describe an interface that combines alternative transcripts, replay and contextually checked pictograms for selected uncertain concepts. The system will initially support French and Spanish functional utterances. A counterbalanced study will assess whether pictorial feedback helps listeners recover the speaker's intended a