WeWorkBuddy

Does Every Instance Count Equally? Order Effects in LLM Multi-Instance Processing

arXiv:2610.29057v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Users increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) to analyse collections of independent inputs, such as product reviews or social media posts, and return a single aggregated answer. This setting requires multi-instance processing (MIP), where a model combines information from multiple instances into one prediction. We study a task in which the model must infer a binary label for each instance, and identify the most frequent label among the fu

阅读原始来源
来源参考:Does Every Instance Count Equally? Order Effects in LLM Multi-Instance Processing。暂未取得截图。
来源记录 · 预览待采集 · arxiv.org打开来源查看完整网页。

来源记录

研究分析

研究主张

论文标识:2610.29057。 来源描述:arXiv:2610.29057v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Users increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) to analyse collections of independent inputs, such as product reviews or social media posts, and return a single aggregated answer. This setting requires multi-instance processing (MIP), where a model combines information from multiple instances into one prediction. We study a task in which the model must infer a binary label for each instance, and identify the most frequent label among the fu

评测与比较记录

可供比较的近期同类记录:“Show HN: Teach a speech model (en) a name by saying it once, on your Mac” (Show HN, 2026年11月5日);“Human-like cross-language generalisation in deep neural speaker embeddings and its acoustic foundations” (arXiv, 2026年11月5日)。主题相近仅用于导航,未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。

结论适用范围

结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。

有效性与复现缺口

需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性;此处没有本站复现实验记录。

复核路线

阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录,针对明确基线复现一个有限结论,再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。