MCP vs CLI for AI Agents: A Comparative Analysis of Tool Integration Strategies for Autonomous Systems
arXiv:2610.30157v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents require interfaces to interact with external systems such as files, APIs, databases, and cloud services. Two competing paradigms have emerged: CLI (Command Line Interface), where agents execute shell commands directly, and MCP (Model Context Protocol), a structured JSON-RPC protocol providing governed, typed tool access. This paper presents a comparative analysis across 14 evaluation dimensions, supported by worked examples, security asse
阅读原始来源
来源记录
研究分析
研究主张
论文标识：2610.30157。 来源描述：arXiv:2610.30157v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents require interfaces to interact with external systems such as files, APIs, databases, and cloud services. Two competing paradigms have emerged: CLI (Command Line Interface), where agents execute shell commands directly, and MCP (Model Context Protocol), a structured JSON-RPC protocol providing governed, typed tool access. This paper presents a comparative analysis across 14 evaluation dimensions, supported by worked examples, security asse
评测与比较记录
可供比较的近期同类记录：“Paper: Nubank cuts AI agent update cycles from 3 weeks to under 5 days” (Hacker News, 2026年11月6日)；“Cognitive Bias Signatures in Search-Equipped LLM Agents: A Stage-Resolved Analysis” (arXiv, 2026年11月5日)。主题相近仅用于导航，未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。
结论适用范围
结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。
有效性与复现缺口
需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性；此处没有本站复现实验记录。
复核路线
阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录，针对明确基线复现一个有限结论，再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。