Each Insufficient in Its Own Way: Calibrating Language Models Across Varying Evidence States
arXiv:2610.33237v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How can a language model know whether it has enough evidence to answer? Language models tend to answer even when the evidence they have is insufficient. Deciding whether to answer or gather more evidence requires a calibrated estimate of how likely an answer is to be correct with the available evidence. However, most calibration work treats the input as fixed, without asking how this estimate should change with the evidence. We introduce \emph{evid
阅读原始来源
来源记录
研究分析
研究主张
论文标识：2610.33237。 来源描述：arXiv:2610.33237v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How can a language model know whether it has enough evidence to answer? Language models tend to answer even when the evidence they have is insufficient. Deciding whether to answer or gather more evidence requires a calibrated estimate of how likely an answer is to be correct with the available evidence. However, most calibration work treats the input as fixed, without asking how this estimate should change with the evidence. We introduce \emph{evid
评测与比较记录
可供比较的近期同类记录：“Show HN: Teach a speech model (en) a name by saying it once, on your Mac” (Show HN, 2026年11月5日)；“Human-like cross-language generalisation in deep neural speaker embeddings and its acoustic foundations” (arXiv, 2026年11月5日)。主题相近仅用于导航，未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。
结论适用范围
结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。
有效性与复现缺口
需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性；此处没有本站复现实验记录。
复核路线
阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录，针对明确基线复现一个有限结论，再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。