Early Stopping in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey and Empirical Audit of Efficiency and Reliability
arXiv:2611.00166v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large reasoning models can improve accuracy by generating longer reasoning traces, but some of this computation may be unnecessary. Early-stopping methods aim to stop once enough reasoning is available to answer. Evaluating these methods requires accounting for the cost of deciding when to stop and the reliability of the resulting answer. We evaluate different methods across five reasoning models on mathematical and scientific reasoning, code gener
阅读原始来源
来源记录
研究分析
研究主张
论文标识：2611.00166。 来源描述：arXiv:2611.00166v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large reasoning models can improve accuracy by generating longer reasoning traces, but some of this computation may be unnecessary. Early-stopping methods aim to stop once enough reasoning is available to answer. Evaluating these methods requires accounting for the cost of deciding when to stop and the reliability of the resulting answer. We evaluate different methods across five reasoning models on mathematical and scientific reasoning, code gener
评测与比较记录
可供比较的近期同类记录：“CCDWIKI: Decoupling Case Formulation from Response Generation in Longitudinal CBT Dialogue” (arXiv, 2026年11月5日)；“AI-Driven SaaS Platform Integration: AI Express for Unified Generative AI Services with Pay-As-You-Go Credit Systems and Scalable Microservice Archite” (arXiv, 2026年11月5日)。主题相近仅用于导航，未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。
结论适用范围
结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。
有效性与复现缺口
需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性；此处没有本站复现实验记录。
复核路线
阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录，针对明确基线复现一个有限结论，再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。