OmniMechanism Design for Human-AI Collaboration with Impressionable Minds
arXiv:2611.00441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, effectively integrating human expertise with AI outputs is critical for reliable decision-making. A substantial body of theoretical work studies optimal mechanisms for human-AI collaboration (HAC), focusing on when to involve humans and how to combine their expertise with AI predictions. However, these approaches largely overlook a key factor highlighted by empirical
阅读原始来源
来源记录
研究分析
研究主张
论文标识：2611.00441。 来源描述：arXiv:2611.00441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, effectively integrating human expertise with AI outputs is critical for reliable decision-making. A substantial body of theoretical work studies optimal mechanisms for human-AI collaboration (HAC), focusing on when to involve humans and how to combine their expertise with AI predictions. However, these approaches largely overlook a key factor highlighted by empirical
评测与比较记录
可供比较的近期同类记录：“Rewrite, Then Veto: Rewriter-Agnostic Edit Gating for LLM-Based Post-OCR Correction” (arXiv, 2026年11月5日)；“How Well Can Large Language Models Impersonate Individual Authors? A Comparative Evaluation” (arXiv, 2026年11月5日)。主题相近仅用于导航，未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。
结论适用范围
结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。
有效性与复现缺口
需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性；此处没有本站复现实验记录。
复核路线
阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录，针对明确基线复现一个有限结论，再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。