WeWorkBuddy

Quantiles, Not Points: Streaming Quantile Matching for Ordinal-Aware LLM-as-a-Judge Calibration

arXiv:2611.00447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-as-a-judge scores are often distributionally shifted from human ratings on any given evaluation task, and post-hoc calibration (mapping LLM to human scores in a small labeled anchor set) has become a popular method to correct for this shift. In this paper we derive the calibration from two positions: that LLMaJ scores are ordinal ratings drawn from a distribution rather than isolated points. We present streaming quantile matching (SQM), a versi

阅读原始来源
原始网页截图: Quantiles, Not Points: Streaming Quantile Matching for Ordinal-Aware LLM-as-a-Judge Calibration
原始网页截图 · arxiv.org

来源记录

研究分析

研究主张

论文标识:2611.00447。 来源描述:arXiv:2611.00447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-as-a-judge scores are often distributionally shifted from human ratings on any given evaluation task, and post-hoc calibration (mapping LLM to human scores in a small labeled anchor set) has become a popular method to correct for this shift. In this paper we derive the calibration from two positions: that LLMaJ scores are ordinal ratings drawn from a distribution rather than isolated points. We present streaming quantile matching (SQM), a versi

评测与比较记录

可供比较的近期同类记录:“Memorilla: Latent Semantic Memory for LLMs” (Hacker News, 2026年11月6日);“Show HN: Ru-Jev – an open model that scores caller-supplied options on CPU (MIT)” (Show HN, 2026年11月6日)。主题相近仅用于导航,未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。

结论适用范围

结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。

有效性与复现缺口

需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性;此处没有本站复现实验记录。

复核路线

阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录,针对明确基线复现一个有限结论,再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。