Whose Transparency is it Anyway? Understanding Generative AI Transparency Needs and Gaps Across Stakeholders
arXiv:2611.05549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transparency has become a central principle in AI governance, yet there is little agreement about what transparency means, for whom, and in what contexts. Drawing on interpretive flexibility within the Social Construction of Technology, this paper examines how different stakeholders understand and experience transparency in generative AI. This study draws from a global survey of 400 end-users, AI builders, and policymakers, complemented by a struct
阅读原始来源
来源记录
研究分析
研究主张
论文标识：2611.05549。 来源描述：arXiv:2611.05549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transparency has become a central principle in AI governance, yet there is little agreement about what transparency means, for whom, and in what contexts. Drawing on interpretive flexibility within the Social Construction of Technology, this paper examines how different stakeholders understand and experience transparency in generative AI. This study draws from a global survey of 400 end-users, AI builders, and policymakers, complemented by a struct
评测与比较记录
尚未提取结构化结果表、数据集、比较基线和评测预算。来源描述中的性能数字仍属于原作者主张。
结论适用范围
结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。
有效性与复现缺口
需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性；此处没有本站复现实验记录。
复核路线
阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录，针对明确基线复现一个有限结论，再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。