Language, Not Code Abstraction: Natural-language Training Shapes Brain-aligned Geometry
arXiv:2611.09027v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Code-trained language models produce positive brain scores, which raises the question of whether abstract structure learned from programming languages can substitute for natural-language training. We trained 25 GPT-2-small models on TinyStories, Python, C functions, x86-64 assembly, and the corresponding machine code, and scored them using a shared tokenizer and encoding procedure against matched random-weight models. On Pereira-243 and Tuckute2024
阅读原始来源
来源记录
研究分析
研究主张
论文标识：2611.09027。 来源描述：arXiv:2611.09027v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Code-trained language models produce positive brain scores, which raises the question of whether abstract structure learned from programming languages can substitute for natural-language training. We trained 25 GPT-2-small models on TinyStories, Python, C functions, x86-64 assembly, and the corresponding machine code, and scored them using a shared tokenizer and encoding procedure against matched random-weight models. On Pereira-243 and Tuckute2024
评测与比较记录
可供比较的近期同类记录：“Asymmetric Correspondence Learning for Lexical and Style Embeddings: Interpreting Latent Space via Acoustic Features” (arXiv, 2026年11月9日)；“Representational drift in a code model: behaviour settles, which neurons carry it does not” (arXiv, 2026年11月9日)。主题相近仅用于导航，未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。
结论适用范围
结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。
有效性与复现缺口
需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性；此处没有本站复现实验记录。
复核路线
阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录，针对明确基线复现一个有限结论，再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。