The Indic Token Tax in 2026: Measuring Tokenizer. Disparity and Its Cost for the Languages of India
arXiv:2611.13058v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Commercial language model APIs bill per token, so a tokenizer that needs more tokens for the same content in one language makes that language more expensive, slower, and able to fit less text in a fixed context window. We measure this disparity for nine public tokenizers, including those of GPT-4, GPT-4o, Qwen2.5, DeepSeek-V3, Mistral-Nemo and four Sarvam models, on all 25 languages of India available in FLORES-200 (2,009 professionally translated
阅读原始来源
来源记录
研究分析
研究主张
论文标识：2611.13058。 来源描述：arXiv:2611.13058v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Commercial language model APIs bill per token, so a tokenizer that needs more tokens for the same content in one language makes that language more expensive, slower, and able to fit less text in a fixed context window. We measure this disparity for nine public tokenizers, including those of GPT-4, GPT-4o, Qwen2.5, DeepSeek-V3, Mistral-Nemo and four Sarvam models, on all 25 languages of India available in FLORES-200 (2,009 professionally translated
评测与比较记录
可供比较的近期同类记录：“Train on prefill, monitor at decode: Using sparse autoencoders for topic monitoring” (arXiv, 2026年11月11日)；“Multi-Future Drafting: Mixture Block Drafters for Tree-Verified Speculative Decoding” (arXiv, 2026年11月11日)。主题相近仅用于导航，未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。
结论适用范围
结论只能在所述模型版本、任务、数据与推理预算内解释。社区票数、下载量或榜单位置不能证明另一工作流中的可靠性。
有效性与复现缺口
需核对样本选择、基线配置、不确定性、数据污染风险、负面结果以及代码或权重可获取性；此处没有本站复现实验记录。
复核路线
阅读论文或模型卡及评测附录，针对明确基线复现一个有限结论，再测试代表性用户任务并记录结论失效的场景。