Ask HN: Have you changed your setup in the age of AI and mass vulnerabilities?
I'm curious if given all the recent advancements in LLMs but also news about hacks, vulnerabilities and exploits anyone has changed substantially their setup (OS, devices, tools, security policies, etc.) Have you reduced your surface of attack? Searched for more isolated environments? Started using Nix thanks to agentic aid? Stopped using IDEs and other tools you used for years?
阅读原始来源来源记录
指标快照
points · 3 votes
2026-11-05 16:03:10.385Z
cumulative since publication
研究分析
用户报告的问题
来源描述:I'm curious if given all the recent advancements in LLMs but also news about hacks, vulnerabilities and exploits anyone has changed substantially their setup (OS, devices, tools, security policies, etc.) Have you reduced your surface of attack? Searched for more isolated environments? Started using Nix thanks to agentic aid? Stopped using IDEs and other tools you used for years?
频次与替代方案
记录作者:dysoco。 来源票数: 3 votes (2026年11月5日 UTC; cumulative since publication);前次同口径记录为 3(2026年11月5日 UTC),两个观测值不等于需求增长。 可供比较的近期同类记录:“[问与答] 寻找一个 ai 开发的底盘框架。” (V2EX, 2026年11月7日);“Ask HN: Non-Malicious Bots” (Hacker News, 2026年11月7日)。主题相近仅用于导航,未核验其是否属于同一需求或独立证据。
需求判断
将报告的任务或障碍作为访谈线索。功能请求、抱怨或替代方案搜索本身并不能确定预算负责人或付费意愿。
商业证据缺口
待补证据:受影响的独立用户、重复发生场景、当前绕行方案、实际时间或金钱成本、采购权限,以及对具体报价的响应。
需求验证动作
按相同任务整理原始问题,去重作者和转载;核对今天如何处理、实际成本多少,再测试明确报价后判断付费需求。