DeepSeek Flash
Name variants Deepseek flash
Been using this in all my sessions the last months. Opus 5.5 (over MCP) spawns Deepseek flash agents - and codex for audits etc. Very curious to hear what the HN crowd thinks/makes of it.
This explanation quotes or summarizes the cited source record. Saving creates a bookmark on this device, with no automatic account sync.
- First observed in our collection
- Oct 22, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC
- Earliest cited publication
- Oct 22, 2026, 1:06 PM UTC
- Last observed
- Nov 5, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC
Evidence in the last complete seven days
- Source mentions
- 1 Previous seven days 1
- Distinct sources
- 1 Previous 1
- Comparable growth
- Not comparable
- Ranking appearances
- 0
Collection observations and undated records are separate from dated publication counts. Observed in 7d：1 · Undated records：0
Collection coverage · Limited historyCurrent / previous observed days 7 / 3
Counts use complete UTC days. First observed means first seen by this collection, not when a term was coined.
Current window：2026-10-29 → 2026-11-05 (end excluded) · History 11 days
| Source | Current days | Previous days | Last success |
|---|---|---|---|
| arXiv | 6 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC |
| arXiv | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 8:30 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 4:00 PM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 1 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 4:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 4:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 4:45 PM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 4:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Discovery | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Trending | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 6:45 PM UTC |
| 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC | |
| Hugging Face | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 8:15 AM UTC |
| Hugging Face Spaces | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 6:45 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:30 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:30 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC |
| Show HN | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 9:15 PM UTC |
| MIT News | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 4:15 PM UTC |
| OpenAI | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 11:30 AM UTC |
| Product Hunt | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 6:45 PM UTC |
| 量子位 | 7 | 3 | Nov 4, 2026, 10:15 AM UTC |
| OpenRouter | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 11:27 PM UTC |
| Hugging Face Models | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 11:27 PM UTC |
| HF Daily Papers | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 11:27 PM UTC |
| OpenRouter | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 11:27 PM UTC |
| SEC EDGAR | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:30 PM UTC |
| Sequoia Capital | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC |
| Simon Willison | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| TechCrunch | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 8:30 PM UTC |
| Contracts Finder | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 7:45 PM UTC |
| V2EX | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 8:30 PM UTC |
- Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
- Both weeks need adequate, comparable collection coverage.
Daily history · up to 90 days
Bars show dated source mentions. The latest UTC day may be incomplete. Zero mentions and missing collection coverage are different conditions.
View accessible daily data
| UTC date | Mentions | Sources | Observations | Ranking appearances |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-03 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-11-04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-05 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Source evidence
Sources in the evidence shown：Show HN 1 · V2EX 2
Show HN · Published Nov 5, 2026
Show HN: Umbel – Remote-control agent CLIs over tmux
Been using this in all my sessions the last months. Opus 5.5 (over MCP) spawns Deepseek flash agents - and codex for audits etc. Very curious to hear what the HN crowd thinks/makes of it.
View source record →V2EX · Published Nov 3, 2026
[程序员] QuireKit 编辑器的 AI-Native 是如何设计的？谈谈我对真正 AI-Native 的理解
先说结论，我个人认为，AI-Native 的编辑器，不在于形式，无论是左编辑器右输入框，还是选中后弹出 AI 润色、续写框，又或是正文下方放类似对话形式的输入框，本质并没有任何不同。在 Tiptap 体系下，只要不是通过命令原生操作，我认为就全都不算 Native 。个人认为真正的 Native ，是模型能原生操作编辑器，不是先生成 markdown 再通过兼容层转为编辑器内容，也不是将 markdown 转为兼容的 HTML 再通过兼容层转为编辑器内容，并且你不需要为每个功能都为模型编写提示词，你只需要一种机制，让模型能够知道编辑器有哪些能力，并且知道这些能力的参数，调用方式就够了，至于如何调用，那就得看模型的调度能力到底几何了。 下面是 QuireKit Classic 里的一次真实运行：一句话让 AI 把
View source record →V2EX · Published Oct 22, 2026
[问与答] 伟大的 v 友 DeepSeek Flash 在哪里买最划算？
View source record →
Review priority 38 / 100
This score orders research candidates. It is not search volume, a forecast or verified commercial demand.
Evidence
8 / 30Distinct dated articles or first observations; repeat crawling adds nothing.
Publisher diversity
8 / 25Conservative owner grouping; syndicated copies count once.
Comparable change
0 / 20Comparable complete weeks only; no percentage from a zero baseline.
Recent evidence
14.9 / 15Latest publication or first observation, not repeated fetch time.
Name specificity
7.2 / 10Explicit entities and technical concepts outrank ambiguous acronyms.
Limitations and interpretation
- First observation is a collection milestone, not proof that a word or product is new to the world.
- Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
- First observed here is not the invention date of a name or idea.
- Candidates come from public titles, summaries and entity URLs, not verified full-text analysis.
- Owner grouping is conservative; undisclosed syndication may remain.
- An established concept or common product name retained as a baseline, not a newly invented term.
- Both weeks need adequate, comparable collection coverage.
- Sources behind this term changed or lack a comparable baseline.
- The previous week is too small for a reliable percentage change.
- Current evidence comes from one publisher or owner.