具备当下所有
具备当下所有 AI 工具（ codex 这些）的基本能力，读文件，写文件，操作浏览器，网络搜索，终端，多 agent ，提问等 基本是应该对齐了第一梯队的 harness 能力 相比其他 codex 这里产品的区别点在于 “专门服务于办公文件（ word 文档，ppt ，excel ）”这类场景（就是纯粹）吧，有如下优势 1.设计了对应的专属工具，所以理论上应该会比用 skill 的方式去改文件更省 token ，更快吧； 2.在预览方面做了一些 ui 的小巧思 diff 查看（支持办公 office 三件套的） 3.联动 wps 进行跳转编辑与刷新 4.配套知识库能力（集成了 lancdb ），支持大量文件构建索引（传统知识库老几样，向量话与索引，普通的倒排索引） 5.未来性设计，我往未来几年看，应该是不需要
This explanation quotes or summarizes the cited source record. Saving creates a bookmark on this device, with no automatic account sync.
- First observed in our collection
- Oct 21, 2026, 3:30 AM UTC
- Earliest cited publication
- Oct 21, 2026, 3:07 AM UTC
- Last observed
- Oct 21, 2026, 4:06 AM UTC
Evidence in the last complete seven days
- Source mentions
- 0 Previous seven days 0
- Distinct sources
- 0 Previous 0
- Comparable growth
- Not comparable
- Ranking appearances
- 0
Collection observations and undated records are separate from dated publication counts. Observed in 7d：0 · Undated records：0
Collection coverage · Comparable windowsCurrent / previous observed days 7 / 7
Counts use complete UTC days. First observed means first seen by this collection, not when a term was coined.
Current window：2026-10-31 → 2026-11-07 (end excluded) · History 19 days
| Source | Current days | Previous days | Last success |
|---|---|---|---|
| arXiv | 6 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 12:45 AM UTC |
| arXiv | 7 | 4 | Nov 7, 2026, 5:30 AM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:30 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:30 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:45 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:45 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 1:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 3 | Nov 7, 2026, 12:45 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 2:45 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 2:45 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 5:30 PM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Discovery | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:45 PM UTC |
| GitHub Trending | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 8:00 PM UTC |
| 7 | 4 | Nov 7, 2026, 8:45 AM UTC | |
| Hugging Face | 7 | 4 | Nov 7, 2026, 8:45 AM UTC |
| Hugging Face Spaces | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 10:30 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 8:00 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:45 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:45 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:45 PM UTC |
| Show HN | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 4:45 PM UTC |
| MIT News | 7 | 4 | Nov 7, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC |
| OpenAI | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 11:45 AM UTC |
| Product Hunt | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 8:00 PM UTC |
| 量子位 | 6 | 5 | Nov 6, 2026, 7:00 PM UTC |
| OpenRouter | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 10:37 PM UTC |
| GitHub Trending | 7 | 7 | Nov 6, 2026, 1:15 PM UTC |
| Hugging Face Models | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 10:37 PM UTC |
| HF Daily Papers | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 10:37 PM UTC |
| OpenRouter | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 10:37 PM UTC |
| Product Hunt | 7 | 7 | Nov 6, 2026, 1:15 PM UTC |
| SEC EDGAR | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 10:45 PM UTC |
| Sequoia Capital | 7 | 4 | Nov 7, 2026, 6:45 AM UTC |
| Simon Willison | 2 | 0 | Nov 7, 2026, 3:30 PM UTC |
| TechCrunch | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 9:45 PM UTC |
| Contracts Finder | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 8:15 PM UTC |
| V2EX | 7 | 5 | Nov 7, 2026, 9:45 PM UTC |
- Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
Daily history · up to 90 days
Bars show dated source mentions. The latest UTC day may be incomplete. Zero mentions and missing collection coverage are different conditions.
Dotted markers indicate days with no record. They are not counted as zero mentions.
View accessible daily data
| UTC date | Mentions | Sources | Observations | Ranking appearances |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-22 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-23 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![Source reference for [程序员] 关于我想拳打 workbuudy 脚踢豆包工作（在办公文件处理方面），开发的产品，代码已开源. Screenshot not yet available.](/media/053f2fbf2acc1d0b08872c77)
Source evidence
Sources in the evidence shown：V2EX 1
V2EX · Published Oct 21, 2026
[程序员] 关于我想拳打 workbuudy 脚踢豆包工作（在办公文件处理方面），开发的产品，代码已开源
具备当下所有 AI 工具（ codex 这些）的基本能力，读文件，写文件，操作浏览器，网络搜索，终端，多 agent ，提问等 基本是应该对齐了第一梯队的 harness 能力 相比其他 codex 这里产品的区别点在于 “专门服务于办公文件（ word 文档，ppt ，excel ）”这类场景（就是纯粹）吧，有如下优势 1.设计了对应的专属工具，所以理论上应该会比用 skill 的方式去改文件更省 token ，更快吧； 2.在预览方面做了一些 ui 的小巧思 diff 查看（支持办公 office 三件套的） 3.联动 wps 进行跳转编辑与刷新 4.配套知识库能力（集成了 lancdb ），支持大量文件构建索引（传统知识库老几样，向量话与索引，普通的倒排索引） 5.未来性设计，我往未来几年看，应该是不需要
View source record →
Review priority 8 / 100
This score orders research candidates. It is not search volume, a forecast or verified commercial demand.
Evidence
0 / 30Distinct dated articles or first observations; repeat crawling adds nothing.
Publisher diversity
0 / 25Conservative owner grouping; syndicated copies count once.
Comparable change
0 / 20Comparable complete weeks only; no percentage from a zero baseline.
Recent evidence
0 / 15Latest publication or first observation, not repeated fetch time.
Name specificity
8 / 10Explicit entities and technical concepts outrank ambiguous acronyms.
Limitations and interpretation
- First observation is a collection milestone, not proof that a word or product is new to the world.
- Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
- First observed here is not the invention date of a name or idea.
- Candidates come from public titles, summaries and entity URLs, not verified full-text analysis.
- Owner grouping is conservative; undisclosed syndication may remain.
- The previous week is too small for a reliable percentage change.
- Current evidence comes from one publisher or owner.