Qwen3.5

Evidence in the last complete seven days

Source mentions

0

Previous seven days 1

Distinct sources

0

Previous 1

Comparable growth

Not comparable

Ranking appearances

0

Collection observations and undated records are separate from dated publication counts. Observed in 7d：1 · Undated records：0

Daily history · up to 90 days

Bars show dated source mentions. The latest UTC day may be incomplete. Zero mentions and missing collection coverage are different conditions.

Dotted markers indicate days with no record. They are not counted as zero mentions.

Source evidence

Sources in the evidence shown：GitHub Releases 2

1. GitHub Releases · Published Oct 26, 2026

   Release: v5.21.0

   Release v5.21.0 New Model additions MiniCPM-OCR MiniCPM-OCR is a document-understanding model from OpenBMB's MiniCPM-V family. It keeps the MiniCPM-V 4.6 architecture, which pairs a SigLIP vision encoder and a window-attention merger with a Qwen3.5 language model. It is specialized for reading text-dense images such as scanned pages, screenshots, receipts an

   View source record →

2. GitHub Releases · Published Aug 26, 2026

   Release: v5.16.0

   Release v5.16.0 New Model additions Qwen4-Exp Qwen4-Exp builds on Qwen3.5's hybrid text and multimodal architecture with three key components: GatedResidual (GR), Qwen Sparse Attention (QSA), and Per-Layer Embedding (PLE). GR is a Qwen-developed residual architecture that combines Hyper-Connection with GatedNorm. It mixes multiple residual streams with fine-

   View source record →

Review priority 40 / 100

This score orders research candidates. It is not search volume, a forecast or verified commercial demand.

• Evidence

  8 / 30

  Distinct dated articles or first observations; repeat crawling adds nothing.

• Publisher diversity

  8 / 25

  Conservative owner grouping; syndicated copies count once.

• Comparable change

  0 / 20

  Comparable complete weeks only; no percentage from a zero baseline.

• Recent evidence

  14.3 / 15

  Latest publication or first observation, not repeated fetch time.

• Name specificity

  9.4 / 10

  Explicit entities and technical concepts outrank ambiguous acronyms.

Limitations and interpretation

• First observation is a collection milestone, not proof that a word or product is new to the world.
• Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
• First observed here is not the invention date of a name or idea.
• Candidates come from public titles, summaries and entity URLs, not verified full-text analysis.
• Owner grouping is conservative; undisclosed syndication may remain.
• Both weeks need adequate, comparable collection coverage.
• Sources behind this term changed or lack a comparable baseline.
• Recent evidence includes collection over three days after publication.
• The previous week is too small for a reliable percentage change.
• Current evidence comes from one publisher or owner.