CLR-Bench
arXiv:2610.40758v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving agents rewrite a persistent state from feedback, but it is largely untested whether this lets them learn a rule nobody told them. An agent can also pass by writing down each correction as an exception, and its list then grows with every new rule. We introduce CLR-Bench, a Curriculum of Latent Rule
This explanation quotes or summarizes the cited source record. Saving creates a bookmark on this device, with no automatic account sync.
- First observed in our collection
- Nov 3, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
- Earliest cited publication
- Nov 2, 2026, 5:00 AM UTC
- Last observed
- Nov 3, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Evidence in the last complete seven days
- Source mentions
- 1 Previous seven days 0
- Distinct sources
- 1 Previous 0
- Comparable growth
- Not comparable
- Ranking appearances
- 0
Collection observations and undated records are separate from dated publication counts. Observed in 7d：1 · Undated records：0
Collection coverage · Limited historyCurrent / previous observed days 7 / 3
Counts use complete UTC days. First observed means first seen by this collection, not when a term was coined.
Current window：2026-10-29 → 2026-11-05 (end excluded) · History 11 days
| Source | Current days | Previous days | Last success |
|---|---|---|---|
| arXiv | 6 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC |
| arXiv | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:00 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:00 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:00 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 1 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:14 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:14 PM UTC |
| GitHub Discovery | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| GitHub Trending | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:14 PM UTC |
| 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC | |
| Hugging Face | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 8:15 AM UTC |
| Hugging Face Spaces | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:45 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:30 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:30 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| Show HN | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| MIT News | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| OpenAI | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 11:30 AM UTC |
| Product Hunt | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:45 PM UTC |
| 量子位 | 7 | 3 | Nov 4, 2026, 10:15 AM UTC |
| OpenRouter | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC |
| Hugging Face Models | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC |
| HF Daily Papers | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC |
| OpenRouter | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC |
| SEC EDGAR | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:30 AM UTC |
| Sequoia Capital | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC |
| Simon Willison | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| TechCrunch | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| Contracts Finder | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC |
| V2EX | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
- Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
- Both weeks need adequate, comparable collection coverage.
Daily history · up to 90 days
Bars show dated source mentions. The latest UTC day may be incomplete. Zero mentions and missing collection coverage are different conditions.
View accessible daily data
| UTC date | Mentions | Sources | Observations | Ranking appearances |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-02 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-03 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-11-04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source evidence
Sources in the evidence shown：arXiv 1
arXiv · Published Nov 2, 2026
More Rules, Longer Lists? Benchmarking Self-Evolving Agents on a Hidden-Rule Curriculum
arXiv:2610.40758v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving agents rewrite a persistent state from feedback, but it is largely untested whether this lets them learn a rule nobody told them. An agent can also pass by writing down each correction as an exception, and its list then grows with every new rule. We introduce CLR-Bench, a Curriculum of Latent Rule
View source record →
Review priority 37 / 100
This score orders research candidates. It is not search volume, a forecast or verified commercial demand.
Evidence
8 / 30Distinct dated articles or first observations; repeat crawling adds nothing.
Publisher diversity
8 / 25Conservative owner grouping; syndicated copies count once.
Comparable change
0 / 20Comparable complete weeks only; no percentage from a zero baseline.
Recent evidence
12.2 / 15Latest publication or first observation, not repeated fetch time.
Name specificity
8.3 / 10Explicit entities and technical concepts outrank ambiguous acronyms.
Limitations and interpretation
- First observation is a collection milestone, not proof that a word or product is new to the world.
- Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
- First observed here is not the invention date of a name or idea.
- Candidates come from public titles, summaries and entity URLs, not verified full-text analysis.
- Owner grouping is conservative; undisclosed syndication may remain.
- Both weeks need adequate, comparable collection coverage.
- Sources behind this term changed or lack a comparable baseline.
- The previous week is too small for a reliable percentage change.
- Current evidence comes from one publisher or owner.