CogBattery

Evidence in the last complete seven days

Source mentions

0

Previous seven days 1

Distinct sources

0

Previous 1

Comparable growth

Not comparable

Ranking appearances

1

Collection observations and undated records are separate from dated publication counts. Observed in 7d：1 · Undated records：0

Daily history · up to 90 days

Bars show dated source mentions. The latest UTC day may be incomplete. Zero mentions and missing collection coverage are different conditions.

Source evidence

Sources in the evidence shown：HF Daily Papers 1

1. HF Daily Papers · Published Oct 30, 2026

   CogBattery: Human-Referenced Evaluation of Cognitive Task Behavior and Structure in Language Models

   Human cognitive tasks let us compare language models with humans under controlled conditions. Yet a model can reproduce the direction of a human effect while making different errors. CogBattery evaluates 54 open-weight language models on text adaptations of 13 cognitive paradigms, comparing each with human data from its source study. Like humans, models resp

Review priority 39 / 100

This score orders research candidates. It is not search volume, a forecast or verified commercial demand.

• Evidence

  8 / 30

  Distinct dated articles or first observations; repeat crawling adds nothing.

• Publisher diversity

  8 / 25

  Conservative owner grouping; syndicated copies count once.

• Comparable change

  0 / 20

  Comparable complete weeks only; no percentage from a zero baseline.

• Recent evidence

  14.1 / 15

  Latest publication or first observation, not repeated fetch time.

• Name specificity

  8.5 / 10

  Explicit entities and technical concepts outrank ambiguous acronyms.

Limitations and interpretation

• First observation is a collection milestone, not proof that a word or product is new to the world.
• Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
• First observed here is not the invention date of a name or idea.
• Candidates come from public titles, summaries and entity URLs, not verified full-text analysis.
• Owner grouping is conservative; undisclosed syndication may remain.
• Repeat ranking appearances are observations, not new articles or independent endorsements.
• Sources behind this term changed or lack a comparable baseline.
• Recent evidence includes collection over three days after publication.
• The previous week is too small for a reliable percentage change.
• Current evidence comes from one publisher or owner.