AI Ethics by Design: Implementing Customizable Guardrails for Responsible AI Development
arXiv:2411.14442v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper explores the development of an ethical guardrail framework for AI systems, emphasizing the importance of customizable guardrails that align with diverse user values and underlying ethics. We address the challenges of AI ethics by proposing a structure that integrates rules, policies, and AI assistants to ensure responsible AI behavior, while comparing the proposed framework to the existing state-of-the-art guardrails. By focusi
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2411.14442. Source account: arXiv:2411.14442v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper explores the development of an ethical guardrail framework for AI systems, emphasizing the importance of customizable guardrails that align with diverse user values and underlying ethics. We address the challenges of AI ethics by proposing a structure that integrates rules, policies, and AI assistants to ensure responsible AI behavior, while comparing the proposed framework to the existing state-of-the-art guardrails. By focusi
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “Underdog shows off a 32MB speech model in new demo” (TechCrunch, Nov 6, 2026); “Redacting Personal Data: A Speed and Accuracy Comparison of Regex, Presidio and Hybrid Designs” (arXiv, Nov 6, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.