Simply Logical -- The First Three Decades
arXiv:2610.28912v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper charts the evolution of the Prolog textbook Simply Logical -- Intelligent Reasoning by Example from print with runnable programmes on a 3.5-inch diskette published in 1994, via various intermediate online versions, to the fully interactive online edition available today. Our aim is to investigate -- from both the writer's and the reader's perspectives -- the potential impact of technology on educational materials. The three authors of th
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2610.28912. Source account: arXiv:2610.28912v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper charts the evolution of the Prolog textbook Simply Logical -- Intelligent Reasoning by Example from print with runnable programmes on a 3.5-inch diskette published in 1994, via various intermediate online versions, to the fully interactive online edition available today. Our aim is to investigate -- from both the writer's and the reader's perspectives -- the potential impact of technology on educational materials. The three authors of th
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “Overview of the NTCIR-19 SciClaimEval Task: Cross-modal Claim Verification in Scientific Papers” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026); “Self-Supervised Pretraining for Label-Efficient Facial Expression Recognition using Smart Glasses” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.