From Target Selection to Condition Reuse: Auditing Residual Interventions in Tool-Use Models
arXiv:2610.31686v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Activation interventions can make a language model produce a target answer, but can the model use the intended condition in other computations? We study this question in Qwen3.5-27B on tool-use tasks where time or permissions determine eligibility and selection. Across 32 fresh worlds, two case-specific residual-writing variants raise familiar target-selection correctness from 35/128 to 119/128 and from 33/128 to 114/128. Yet these gains disappear
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2610.31686. Source account: arXiv:2610.31686v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Activation interventions can make a language model produce a target answer, but can the model use the intended condition in other computations? We study this question in Qwen3.5-27B on tool-use tasks where time or permissions determine eligibility and selection. Across 32 fresh worlds, two case-specific residual-writing variants raise familiar target-selection correctness from 35/128 to 119/128 and from 33/128 to 114/128. Yet these gains disappear
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “Memorilla: Latent Semantic Memory for LLMs” (Hacker News, Nov 6, 2026); “Show HN: Ru-Jev – an open model that scores caller-supplied options on CPU (MIT)” (Show HN, Nov 6, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.