WeWorkBuddy

Merge-Based Vocabulary Extension Stalls at the Pre-Tokenizer: An English-Preserving Repair for Nepali, Tested in Continued Pretraining

arXiv:2610.33016v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Llama-3, Qwen3 and many other open LLMs pre-tokenize text with a regular expression whose word class admits only Unicode letters. Devanagari vowel signs are combining marks, so this regex splits Nepali words at every vowel sign, and models that use it spend 2.6 to 5.8 times as many tokens on Nepali as on the same English text. Merge-based vocabulary extension cannot join the split pieces: for Llama-3 and Qwen3 no number of new merges brings this pr

Read original source
Source reference for Merge-Based Vocabulary Extension Stalls at the Pre-Tokenizer: An English-Preserving Repair for Nepali, Tested in Continued Pretraining. Screenshot not yet available.
Source record · preview pending · arxiv.orgOpen the source for the full page.

Source record

Research analysis

Research claim

Paper identifier: 2610.33016. Source account: arXiv:2610.33016v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Llama-3, Qwen3 and many other open LLMs pre-tokenize text with a regular expression whose word class admits only Unicode letters. Devanagari vowel signs are combining marks, so this regex splits Nepali words at every vowel sign, and models that use it spend 2.6 to 5.8 times as many tokens on Nepali as on the same English text. Merge-based vocabulary extension cannot join the split pieces: for Llama-3 and Qwen3 no number of new merges brings this pr

Evaluation record

Recent records to compare: “CCDWIKI: Decoupling Case Formulation from Response Generation in Longitudinal CBT Dialogue” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026); “AI-Driven SaaS Platform Integration: AI Express for Unified Generative AI Services with Pay-As-You-Go Credit Systems and Scalable Microservice Archite” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.

What the result supports

Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.

Validity gaps

Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.

Verification plan

Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.