ReCoPII: A Relation-Grounded Framework for Building Contextual PII Masking Datasets
arXiv:2610.35925v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training contextual masking systems for personally identifiable information (PII) requires examples distinguishing maskable from preservable mentions of one entity type, but privacy restrictions limit access to real data. Author-based augmentation (SPY) labels mentions unrelated to the author as non-PII, presuming a single data subject and overlooking others. We propose ReCoPII (Relation-grounded Contextual PII masking), a framework that builds suc
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2610.35925. Source account: arXiv:2610.35925v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training contextual masking systems for personally identifiable information (PII) requires examples distinguishing maskable from preservable mentions of one entity type, but privacy restrictions limit access to real data. Author-based augmentation (SPY) labels mentions unrelated to the author as non-PII, presuming a single data subject and overlooking others. We propose ReCoPII (Relation-grounded Contextual PII masking), a framework that builds suc
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “Overview of the NTCIR-19 SciClaimEval Task: Cross-modal Claim Verification in Scientific Papers” (arXiv, Nov 6, 2026); “Self-Supervised Pretraining for Label-Efficient Facial Expression Recognition using Smart Glasses” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.