OpenFrontiers: A Collection of Open Research Problems and a Benchmark for Scientific Rediscovery
arXiv:2610.37739v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing promise in research-level problem solving, yet a comprehensive collection of such problems is still missing, and evaluating them on research-level problems remains challenging. We introduce OpenFrontiers, a cross-disciplinary resource that combines a structured corpus of open research problems with a retrospective benchmark of recently resolved problems in mathematics. The corpus records problem st
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2610.37739. Source account: arXiv:2610.37739v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing promise in research-level problem solving, yet a comprehensive collection of such problems is still missing, and evaluating them on research-level problems remains challenging. We introduce OpenFrontiers, a cross-disciplinary resource that combines a structured corpus of open research problems with a retrospective benchmark of recently resolved problems in mathematics. The corpus records problem st
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “SRRM: A Retrieval-Reconstruction Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Context Memory in Small Language Models” (arXiv, Nov 6, 2026); “RAGCompass: Generalizable Retriever Routing via Reranking” (arXiv, Nov 6, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.