WeWorkBuddy

Towards Portable Specification of the Agent Harness

arXiv:2610.40917v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models act only through the infrastructure that surrounds them. That infrastructure, the harness, determines what a model can accomplish and how it fails, yet it has no settled definition. To address this gap, we decompose the harness into eight functional components that can be specified and compared across systems, and we propose a portable specification framework that records which model ran in which harness. The record is needed

Read original source
Source reference for Towards Portable Specification of the Agent Harness. Screenshot not yet available.
Source record · preview pending · arxiv.orgOpen the source for the full page.

Source record

Research analysis

Research claim

Paper identifier: 2610.40917. Source account: arXiv:2610.40917v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models act only through the infrastructure that surrounds them. That infrastructure, the harness, determines what a model can accomplish and how it fails, yet it has no settled definition. To address this gap, we decompose the harness into eight functional components that can be specified and compared across systems, and we propose a portable specification framework that records which model ran in which harness. The record is needed

Evaluation record

Recent records to compare: “Cognitive Bias Signatures in Search-Equipped LLM Agents: A Stage-Resolved Analysis” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026); “Prospective Memory for Proactive LLM Agents” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.

What the result supports

Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.

Validity gaps

Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.

Verification plan

Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.