Saidzoda-Tajik-LFM-2.6B: Adapting a 2.6B Hybrid Model to Tajik Tool Calling, and What Continued Pretraining Takes Away
arXiv:2610.41576v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We release Saidzoda-Tajik-LFM-2.6B, a Tajik adaptation of the 2.6B-parameter hybrid model LFM2.5-2.6B-Base, built for tool calling in Tajik on modest hardware. The recipe has two stages: LoRA continued pretraining (CPT) on 1,485,319 cleaned Tajik web documents for 3 epochs, then one epoch of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on a mix of machine-translated Tajik tool calls, English tool calls kept as replay, and Tajik instructions. On a 174-item tool-cal
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2610.41576. Source account: arXiv:2610.41576v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We release Saidzoda-Tajik-LFM-2.6B, a Tajik adaptation of the 2.6B-parameter hybrid model LFM2.5-2.6B-Base, built for tool calling in Tajik on modest hardware. The recipe has two stages: LoRA continued pretraining (CPT) on 1,485,319 cleaned Tajik web documents for 3 epochs, then one epoch of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on a mix of machine-translated Tajik tool calls, English tool calls kept as replay, and Tajik instructions. On a 174-item tool-cal
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “Human-like cross-language generalisation in deep neural speaker embeddings and its acoustic foundations” (arXiv, Nov 6, 2026); “When to Ask, When to Answer: Strategic Clarification for Ambiguous Reference Resolution in Dialogue” (arXiv, Nov 6, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.