PatchScout: Thematic Web Data Collection via Information Foraging
arXiv:2611.00169v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Researchers often need web corpora that are not answers to a single query, but reusable collections of documents spanning many decentralized sources. We refer to this problem as thematic web data collection: assembling semantically relevant documents that share a common theme but are scattered across heterogeneous and structurally disconnected regions of the web. Existing approaches, including traversal-based methods and LLM-driven web agents, are
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2611.00169. Source account: arXiv:2611.00169v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Researchers often need web corpora that are not answers to a single query, but reusable collections of documents spanning many decentralized sources. We refer to this problem as thematic web data collection: assembling semantically relevant documents that share a common theme but are scattered across heterogeneous and structurally disconnected regions of the web. Existing approaches, including traversal-based methods and LLM-driven web agents, are
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “Cognitive Bias Signatures in Search-Equipped LLM Agents: A Stage-Resolved Analysis” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026); “Prospective Memory for Proactive LLM Agents” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.