Quantifying Local and Global Fidelity of Nonlinear Embeddings
arXiv:2611.00290v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dimension reduction methods are chosen by a common claim: t-SNE and UMAP preserve local structure, and PCA preserves global structure. Checking it on given data takes local and global scores on one scale and a test that compares two maps. Both scores come from one curve. The locality profile is the chance-corrected share of each point's k nearest neighbors that a map keeps, over all neighborhood sizes. Its value at k = 10 is the local fidelity L, a
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2611.00290. Source account: arXiv:2611.00290v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dimension reduction methods are chosen by a common claim: t-SNE and UMAP preserve local structure, and PCA preserves global structure. Checking it on given data takes local and global scores on one scale and a test that compares two maps. Both scores come from one curve. The locality profile is the chance-corrected share of each point's k nearest neighbors that a map keeps, over all neighborhood sizes. Its value at k = 10 is the local fidelity L, a
Evaluation record
No structured result table, dataset, baseline or evaluation budget has been extracted. Any performance numbers in the source account remain attributed claims.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.