Compression Technique Interactions in Small Language Models: A Factorial Ablation Study
arXiv:2611.00464v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying small language models on resource-constrained hardware requires compression, yet practitioners lack systematic guidance on how quantization, pruning, and post-compression recovery interact when combined. We present a factorial ablation study evaluating 72 compression configurations across four SLM architectures (2.7B-7B parameters), extended with a 48-configuration ordering analysis, benchmark accuracy validation on 30 compressed models,
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2611.00464. Source account: arXiv:2611.00464v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying small language models on resource-constrained hardware requires compression, yet practitioners lack systematic guidance on how quantization, pruning, and post-compression recovery interact when combined. We present a factorial ablation study evaluating 72 compression configurations across four SLM architectures (2.7B-7B parameters), extended with a 48-configuration ordering analysis, benchmark accuracy validation on 30 compressed models,
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “Show HN: Teach a speech model (en) a name by saying it once, on your Mac” (Show HN, Nov 5, 2026); “Human-like cross-language generalisation in deep neural speaker embeddings and its acoustic foundations” (arXiv, Nov 5, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.