CARD: A Proof-Carrying Certificate-to-Action Interface for Relative-Measurement Graphs
arXiv:2611.03651v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Geometric certificates make mathematical claims about specified estimator objects, while robotic action requires a physical transform, a service decision, and timely proof support. We present CARD, a proof-carrying interface that keeps these objects distinct and records how they combine. Its lifted-fiber formulation separates semantic motion from witness repair and characterizes when projected and proof-carrying costs coincide. Its actionability re
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2611.03651. Source account: arXiv:2611.03651v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Geometric certificates make mathematical claims about specified estimator objects, while robotic action requires a physical transform, a service decision, and timely proof support. We present CARD, a proof-carrying interface that keeps these objects distinct and records how they combine. Its lifted-fiber formulation separates semantic motion from witness repair and characterizes when projected and proof-carrying costs coincide. Its actionability re
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “AuroraWorld: Structured 4D World Modeling for Exo-to-Ego Video Generation in Robot Manipulation” (arXiv, Nov 3, 2026); “OpenAI重写大模型法则，第一条：忠于人类！！” (量子位, Nov 2, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.