META-IR: Meta-Introspective Reasoning for Adaptive Safety Alignment in LLM
arXiv:2611.10089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks and harmful-content prompts, particularly under adversarial distribution shifts where static alignment pipelines fail to generalize. Although introspective methods such as STAIR strengthen refusal consistency, they depend on fixed self-evaluation policies that cannot rapidly adapt to evolving manipulation strategies. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduces META-IR, a m
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2611.10089. Source account: arXiv:2611.10089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks and harmful-content prompts, particularly under adversarial distribution shifts where static alignment pipelines fail to generalize. Although introspective methods such as STAIR strengthen refusal consistency, they depend on fixed self-evaluation policies that cannot rapidly adapt to evolving manipulation strategies. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduces META-IR, a m
Evaluation record
Recent records to compare: “Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders” (arXiv, Nov 10, 2026); “AutoEMatic: Runtime-Adaptive Mixed-Precision LLM Inference via Automatic Exponent-Mantissa Refinement” (arXiv, Nov 10, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.