ProofDiff: Auditable Argument-Level Comparison of AI-Generated Mathematical Proofs
arXiv:2611.10233v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mathematical understanding depends on the route from hypotheses to conclusion: how the parts of a proof function and which dependencies carry the argument forward. This structure can persist when wording or notation changes, while a small alteration to a hypothesis or inference can produce a different argument beneath similar prose. Formal verification can establish that a rewrite proves the same theorem, but not whether it follows the same mathema
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Research claim
Paper identifier: 2611.10233. Source account: arXiv:2611.10233v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mathematical understanding depends on the route from hypotheses to conclusion: how the parts of a proof function and which dependencies carry the argument forward. This structure can persist when wording or notation changes, while a small alteration to a hypothesis or inference can produce a different argument beneath similar prose. Formal verification can establish that a rewrite proves the same theorem, but not whether it follows the same mathema
Evaluation record
No structured result table, dataset, baseline or evaluation budget has been extracted. Any performance numbers in the source account remain attributed claims.
What the result supports
Interpret results only for the reported model version, task, data and inference budget. Community votes, downloads or a benchmark position do not establish reliability in a different workflow.
Validity gaps
Check sample selection, baseline configuration, uncertainty, contamination risk, negative results and access to code or weights. No reproduction by WeWorkBuddy is recorded here.
Verification plan
Read the paper or model card and its evaluation appendix. Reproduce one bounded result against the stated baseline, then test a representative user task and record where the conclusion fails.