V2EX / 2026-11-12

[程序员] 感觉 TRAE 的 Agent 模式有点笨啊，换 WorkBuddy 会好些吗

最近拿 trae 写东西感觉经常会犯一些很低级的错误，写的页面也排版比较随意，不知道是什么原因。而且好像 IDE 模式写出来会准确率高一些，挺奇怪的，问题 IDE 写多个项目又不是很好用。想着换一个 agent 试试，openCode 和 WorkBuddy 会不会好一些呢？ codex 我也在用，但是里面在用 gpt 的模型，不太想切换。大佬们有什么建议吗？

Read original source

Source page screenshot: [程序员] 感觉 TRAE 的 Agent 模式有点笨啊，换 WorkBuddy 会好些吗 — Source page screenshot · www.v2ex.com2026-11-12 UTC

Source record

Source: V2EX
Published: 2026-11-12 05:56:29 UTC
First discovered: 2026-11-12 06:30:25.166Z
Last collected: 2026-11-12 06:30:25.166Z
Author: as110df120
Topic: AI agents
Classification: Other stories
Evidence level: E1 · source record; conclusions unverified

Research analysis

Rule-based research guidance derived from the source record. Audience and commercial demand require validation.

Source record

Source account: 最近拿 trae 写东西感觉经常会犯一些很低级的错误，写的页面也排版比较随意，不知道是什么原因。而且好像 IDE 模式写出来会准确率高一些，挺奇怪的，问题 IDE 写多个项目又不是很好用。想着换一个 agent 试试，openCode 和 WorkBuddy 会不会好一些呢？ codex 我也在用，但是里面在用 gpt 的模型，不太想切换。大佬们有什么建议吗？

Available context

Recent records to compare: “Why Is It So Hard to Teach A.I. Agents to Behave? Researchers Have a Theory” (Hacker News, Nov 12, 2026); “United to block customers from using AI agents, citing cyber threats” (Hacker News, Nov 12, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.

Research status

This record has not been assigned a sufficiently supported main content category. No commercial or performance conclusion is generated.

Missing evidence

The main event, affected audience and supporting primary source need review.

Next step

Read the original and identify the decision it supports before choosing an analysis framework.