Quoting Ted Sanders
In general, LLM performance is incredibly multidimensional. There's no guarantee of a fixed ordering where the model that is best at math is also the model that's best at jokes. Despite that complexity, much of the variation in performance is explained by just a single variable: model size. In general, models that are bigger will (a) be more performant / reliable, (b) cost more per token, and (c) have better recall of esoteric facts. As you note, our models are ordered: Luna < Terra < Sol
Read original source
Source record
Research analysis
Source record
Source account: In general, LLM performance is incredibly multidimensional. There's no guarantee of a fixed ordering where the model that is best at math is also the model that's best at jokes. Despite that complexity, much of the variation in performance is explained by just a single variable: model size. In general, models that are bigger will (a) be more performant / reliable, (b) cost more per token, and (c) have better recall of esoteric facts. As you note, our models are ordered: Luna < Terra < Sol
Available context
Recent records to compare: “A Bit about Email” (Hacker News, Nov 9, 2026); “Outlook.com is rejecting email from domains without DMARC” (Hacker News, Nov 8, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
Research status
This record has not been assigned a sufficiently supported main content category. No commercial or performance conclusion is generated.
Missing evidence
The main event, affected audience and supporting primary source need review.
Next step
Read the original and identify the decision it supports before choosing an analysis framework.