V2EX / 2026-10-21

[程序员] 大家如何看待 ai 文章(博客，公众号，推文帖子)

今天早上我关注的一个公众号博主，用 ai 写了技术的长篇大论推送，他也标注了 ai 高占比写的。我评论说 ai 写的就尽量简短一点，只写核心论点核心逻辑，然后附上有价值的参考资料就行了。 ai 时代把文章写长不值钱，长篇大论的 ai 风格和措辞也会让人没有耐心看下去，就被拉黑了。

Read original source

Source page screenshot: [程序员] 大家如何看待 ai 文章(博客，公众号，推文帖子) — Source page screenshot · www.v2ex.com2026-11-07 UTC

Source record

Source: V2EX
Published: 2026-10-21 03:46:05 UTC
First discovered: 2026-10-21 04:06:57.011Z
Last collected: 2026-10-21 04:06:57.011Z
Author: quboliu
Topic: Other
Classification: Other stories
Evidence level: E1 · source record; conclusions unverified

Research analysis

Rule-based research guidance derived from the source record. Audience and commercial demand require validation.

Source record

Source account: 今天早上我关注的一个公众号博主，用 ai 写了技术的长篇大论推送，他也标注了 ai 高占比写的。我评论说 ai 写的就尽量简短一点，只写核心论点核心逻辑，然后附上有价值的参考资料就行了。 ai 时代把文章写长不值钱，长篇大论的 ai 风格和措辞也会让人没有耐心看下去，就被拉黑了。

Available context

No comparable records or structured measurements are attached.

Research status

This record has not been assigned a sufficiently supported main content category. No commercial or performance conclusion is generated.

Missing evidence

The main event, affected audience and supporting primary source need review.

Next step

Read the original and identify the decision it supports before choosing an analysis framework.