[问与答] 出圈的 ai 短剧持械入宋算是 ai 短剧代表么？
今天花了 2 小时刷完，本质上就是 ai 场景小品剧 运镜，演出，人物调度基本没有 台词全是 1.25 倍，赶的一逼 表演都是 ai 典型的夸张表情。微表情想都不要想 bgm 凑合吧，能听 剧本应该是有人打磨，倒是没有特别大的 ai 味 作为免费剧，打发时间看个乐呵吧 相比之下已经变成烂剧的 outlander 都比这个强不知道多少倍啊 以现在 token 烧法和模型演进速度，是不是可能 2-3 年之后能实现精确的场景/指令遵循，能做到正剧正剧 5-6 成？
Read original source![Source page screenshot: [问与答] 出圈的 ai 短剧持械入宋算是 ai 短剧代表么？](/media/60ddf8ccc2ee79fdaca8d83c?v=2026-11-06T21%3A40%3A12.232Z)
Source record
Research analysis
Reported problem
Source account: 今天花了 2 小时刷完，本质上就是 ai 场景小品剧 运镜，演出，人物调度基本没有 台词全是 1.25 倍，赶的一逼 表演都是 ai 典型的夸张表情。微表情想都不要想 bgm 凑合吧，能听 剧本应该是有人打磨，倒是没有特别大的 ai 味 作为免费剧，打发时间看个乐呵吧 相比之下已经变成烂剧的 outlander 都比这个强不知道多少倍啊 以现在 token 烧法和模型演进速度，是不是可能 2-3 年之后能实现精确的场景/指令遵循，能做到正剧正剧 5-6 成？
Frequency & alternatives
Recorded author: moudy. Recent records to compare: “[问与答] 大语言模型是工具，不会进化出意识” (V2EX, Nov 6, 2026); “A failed attention kernel load is cached: later models fail at forward with `KeyError: ... is not a valid attention implementation`” (GitHub Issues, Nov 5, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.
Demand hypothesis
Treat the reported task or obstacle as an interview lead. A feature request, complaint or search for alternatives does not by itself identify a budget owner or willingness to pay.
Commercial evidence gaps
Missing evidence: distinct affected users, repeated occasions, current workaround, measured time or money cost, purchasing authority and a response to a concrete offer.
Validation decision
Group original reports by the same task and deduplicate authors and reposts. Ask how the task is handled today and what it costs; test a defined offer before claiming paid demand.