V2EX / 2026-10-23

[问与答] [讨论] 如果最前沿的模型那么好，为什么 OpenAI 不直接创办 100 家公司？

标题有点夸张，但讨论可以深入一点：如果最前沿的模型那么好，为什么还要把模型当作主要赚钱的卖点？ OpenAI 或 Anthropic 难道不能自己开创业公司，利用这些模型并开发相应的产品，赚更多钱吗？卖代币真的是最好的策略吗？比如，deepseek 那样拿大模型去股市等用策略赚钱，不是最好的路吗？

Read original source

Source page screenshot: [问与答] [讨论] 如果最前沿的模型那么好，为什么 OpenAI 不直接创办 100 家公司？ — Source page screenshot · www.v2ex.com2026-11-07 UTC

Source record

Source: V2EX
Published: 2026-10-23 08:58:29 UTC
First discovered: 2026-10-23 12:00:13.059Z
Last collected: 2026-10-23 12:00:13.059Z
Author: wbrobot
Topic: AI infrastructure
Classification: User needs & business problems
Evidence level: E1 · source record; conclusions unverified

Research analysis

Rule-based research guidance derived from the source record. Audience and commercial demand require validation.

Reported problem

Source account: 标题有点夸张，但讨论可以深入一点：如果最前沿的模型那么好，为什么还要把模型当作主要赚钱的卖点？ OpenAI 或 Anthropic 难道不能自己开创业公司，利用这些模型并开发相应的产品，赚更多钱吗？卖代币真的是最好的策略吗？比如，deepseek 那样拿大模型去股市等用策略赚钱，不是最好的路吗？

Frequency & alternatives

Recorded author: wbrobot. Recent records to compare: “Ask HN: Microsoft/Azure Outage?” (Hacker News, Nov 12, 2026); “[问与答] 推荐一下 Gemini 4 Carbon 的科研能力，超乎想象得强” (V2EX, Nov 12, 2026). Shared themes are navigation hints; they have not been verified as the same need or independent corroboration.

Demand hypothesis

Treat the reported task or obstacle as an interview lead. A feature request, complaint or search for alternatives does not by itself identify a budget owner or willingness to pay.

Commercial evidence gaps

Missing evidence: distinct affected users, repeated occasions, current workaround, measured time or money cost, purchasing authority and a response to a concrete offer.

Validation decision

Group original reports by the same task and deduplicate authors and reposts. Ask how the task is handled today and what it costs; test a defined offer before claiming paid demand.