GLM-5.3-Flash
Name variants GLM 5.3 flash
我不是程序员，最近在学 AI Coding 。前一阵子知道了 Magpie 。然后把各种能接入的地方都接入了，然后就说试用一下用不了的 Claude Code 。 目前在做一个 Mac 的小软件。发现 GLM 5.3 flash ，在各种 Harness Agent 里面都不如在 Claude Code 里面聪明。天呐，这还有一层等级差距啊？ 这是为啥呀？ 让他在画某个 UI 的途中，在很多 Agent 里面，他跟我玩 Cosplay ，他还跟我说，最迟 30 分钟给方案，你的这个改动要花一天工时，这种非常拟人的话。然后自然就是什么都画不出来也不知道自己为什么错。那你也知道的，就会又陷入到那种拟人的各种出错、各种无法进行的状态。 我才刚刚试了下 Claude Code ，就发现我靠，它真的能分析出来到底哪一个地
This explanation quotes or summarizes the cited source record. Saving creates a bookmark on this device, with no automatic account sync.
- First observed in our collection
- Oct 10, 2026, 9:00 AM UTC
- Earliest cited publication
- Aug 26, 2026, 2:50 PM UTC
- Last observed
- Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC
Evidence in the last complete seven days
- Source mentions
- 1 Previous seven days 1
- Distinct sources
- 1 Previous 1
- Comparable growth
- Not comparable
- Ranking appearances
- 0
Collection observations and undated records are separate from dated publication counts. Observed in 7d：1 · Undated records：1
Collection coverage · Limited historyCurrent / previous observed days 7 / 3
Counts use complete UTC days. First observed means first seen by this collection, not when a term was coined.
Current window：2026-10-29 → 2026-11-05 (end excluded) · History 11 days
| Source | Current days | Previous days | Last success |
|---|---|---|---|
| arXiv | 6 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC |
| arXiv | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:00 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:00 PM UTC |
| Ask HN | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:00 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:15 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 1 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:14 PM UTC |
| GitHub | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| GitHub Issues | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| GitHub Releases | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:14 PM UTC |
| GitHub Discovery | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| GitHub Trending | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:14 PM UTC |
| 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC | |
| Hugging Face | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 8:15 AM UTC |
| Hugging Face Spaces | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:45 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:30 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:30 PM UTC |
| Hacker News | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| Show HN | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| MIT News | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:01 AM UTC |
| OpenAI | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 11:30 AM UTC |
| Product Hunt | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 12:45 PM UTC |
| 量子位 | 7 | 3 | Nov 4, 2026, 10:15 AM UTC |
| OpenRouter | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC |
| Hugging Face Models | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC |
| HF Daily Papers | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC |
| OpenRouter | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:41 PM UTC |
| SEC EDGAR | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:30 AM UTC |
| Sequoia Capital | 7 | 2 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC |
| Simon Willison | 0 | 0 | Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC |
| TechCrunch | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
| Contracts Finder | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC |
| V2EX | 7 | 3 | Nov 5, 2026, 2:30 PM UTC |
- Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
- Both weeks need adequate, comparable collection coverage.
Daily history · up to 90 days
Bars show dated source mentions. The latest UTC day may be incomplete. Zero mentions and missing collection coverage are different conditions.
Dotted markers indicate days with no record. They are not counted as zero mentions.
View accessible daily data
| UTC date | Mentions | Sources | Observations | Ranking appearances |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-08-27 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-08-28 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-08-29 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-08-30 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-08-31 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-01 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-02 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-03 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-04 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-05 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-06 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-07 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-08 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-09 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-10 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-11 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-12 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-13 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-14 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-15 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-16 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-17 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-18 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-19 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-20 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-21 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-22 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-24 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-25 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-26 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-27 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-28 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-29 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-01 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-02 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-03 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-04 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-05 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-06 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-07 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-08 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-09 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-11 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-12 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-13 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-14 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-15 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-16 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-17 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-18 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-19 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-20 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-21 · No record | — | — | — | — |
| 2026-10-22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-28 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-02 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-03 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-11-04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-11-05 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Source evidence
Sources in the evidence shown：OpenRouter 1 · V2EX 2 · GitHub Releases 1
OpenRouter · Published Not supplied
GLM-5.3-Flash
V2EX · Published Nov 2, 2026
[程序员] 在搞一个 AI Coding 的 mac 项目，发现 glm 接入 claude 比 zcode 聪明太多了
我不是程序员，最近在学 AI Coding 。前一阵子知道了 Magpie 。然后把各种能接入的地方都接入了，然后就说试用一下用不了的 Claude Code 。 目前在做一个 Mac 的小软件。发现 GLM 5.3 flash ，在各种 Harness Agent 里面都不如在 Claude Code 里面聪明。天呐，这还有一层等级差距啊？ 这是为啥呀？ 让他在画某个 UI 的途中，在很多 Agent 里面，他跟我玩 Cosplay ，他还跟我说，最迟 30 分钟给方案，你的这个改动要花一天工时，这种非常拟人的话。然后自然就是什么都画不出来也不知道自己为什么错。那你也知道的，就会又陷入到那种拟人的各种出错、各种无法进行的状态。 我才刚刚试了下 Claude Code ，就发现我靠，它真的能分析出来到底哪一个地
View source record →V2EX · Published Oct 28, 2026
[分享创造] 用 AI 重做了集思录的界面
分享一个自己全程用 AI 做的 Chrome 扩展： JSL UI Plugin · 集思录现代化 ，功能如名，就是给集思录重做现代化的界面。主要实现包括： 深浅双主题 卡片化，现代化排版 全站统一的页头页脚等 欢迎大家下载使用，并反馈遇到的问题，我会抽时间跟进修复。 Chrome 商店地址： JSL UI Plugin · 集思录现代化 Github 地址： jsl-ui-plugin 部分截图界面如下： 再写一点感受。 我原本是写后端的，对前端不熟，尤其搞不懂 CSS ，觉得调样式太过复杂，之前多次有想过学习前端都因 CSS 搞不掂而放弃。 但这两周用 AI 重写集思录界面的过程，让我感觉调 CSS 已经没有太高门槛了。具体来说，我用的主要是 ZCode + GLM-5.3-Flash / DeepSeek
View source record →GitHub Releases · Published Aug 26, 2026
Release v5.16.1
Release v5.16.1 This is a special release as we include GLM! (and a few small fixes) GLM-5.3-Flash GLM-5.3-Flash, the first natively multimodal model in the GLM-5 series. With 320B total parameters and just 18B active parameters, it outperforms GLM-5.2 across benchmarks and real-world workloads at one-tenth the price, while approaching Claude Opus 4.8 on cod
View source record →
Review priority 40 / 100
This score orders research candidates. It is not search volume, a forecast or verified commercial demand.
Evidence
8 / 30Distinct dated articles or first observations; repeat crawling adds nothing.
Publisher diversity
8 / 25Conservative owner grouping; syndicated copies count once.
Comparable change
0 / 20Comparable complete weeks only; no percentage from a zero baseline.
Recent evidence
15 / 15Latest publication or first observation, not repeated fetch time.
Name specificity
9.4 / 10Explicit entities and technical concepts outrank ambiguous acronyms.
Limitations and interpretation
- First observation is a collection milestone, not proof that a word or product is new to the world.
- Counts describe monitored public sources, not the whole web or search demand.
- First observed here is not the invention date of a name or idea.
- Candidates come from public titles, summaries and entity URLs, not verified full-text analysis.
- Owner grouping is conservative; undisclosed syndication may remain.
- Undated observations cannot establish publication growth.
- Repeat ranking appearances are observations, not new articles or independent endorsements.
- Both weeks need adequate, comparable collection coverage.
- Sources behind this term changed or lack a comparable baseline.
- The previous week is too small for a reliable percentage change.
- Current evidence comes from one publisher or owner.